<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 88: The Singularity Research OS with Galen Hunt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.se-radio.net/2008/03/episode-88-the-singularity-research-os-with-galen-hunt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.se-radio.net/2008/03/episode-88-the-singularity-research-os-with-galen-hunt/</link>
	<description>The Podcast for Professional Software Developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 01:48:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.se-radio.net/2008/03/episode-88-the-singularity-research-os-with-galen-hunt/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You missed your chance to ask your guest why Microsoft chose to hitch its wagon to the neo-AI-term &quot;Singularity.&quot; And, not a single mention of Ray Kurzweil.

As I get old, I grow tired of re-definitions of existing terms and creations of new terms where existing ones suffice, esp. to create a false impression of originality in the minds of the uninitiated.

http://www.linkedin.com/in/reechard
http://reechard.vox.com
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed your chance to ask your guest why Microsoft chose to hitch its wagon to the neo-AI-term &#8220;Singularity.&#8221; And, not a single mention of Ray Kurzweil.</p>
<p>As I get old, I grow tired of re-definitions of existing terms and creations of new terms where existing ones suffice, esp. to create a false impression of originality in the minds of the uninitiated.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/reechard" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkedin.com/in/reechard</a><br />
<a href="http://reechard.vox.com" rel="nofollow">http://reechard.vox.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://www.se-radio.net/2008/03/episode-88-the-singularity-research-os-with-galen-hunt/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, I could have asked about the history of the name. 

However, I don&#039;t think Kurzweil is the first to use the term &quot;singularity&quot; (I am aware of his stuff!). I would guess physicists have used it before to describe the state of the universe right at the big bang.

As a side note, if you google the term, the MS project shows up before Kurzweil&#039;s Homepage :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I could have asked about the history of the name. </p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t think Kurzweil is the first to use the term &#8220;singularity&#8221; (I am aware of his stuff!). I would guess physicists have used it before to describe the state of the universe right at the big bang.</p>
<p>As a side note, if you google the term, the MS project shows up before Kurzweil&#8217;s Homepage <img src='http://www.se-radio.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://www.se-radio.net/2008/03/episode-88-the-singularity-research-os-with-galen-hunt/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See here for details:
   http://www.codeplex.com/singularity

Markus]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See here for details:<br />
   <a href="http://www.codeplex.com/singularity" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeplex.com/singularity</a></p>
<p>Markus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ollie</title>
		<link>http://www.se-radio.net/2008/03/episode-88-the-singularity-research-os-with-galen-hunt/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/104548]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/104548" rel="nofollow">http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/104548</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pknotz</title>
		<link>http://www.se-radio.net/2008/03/episode-88-the-singularity-research-os-with-galen-hunt/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>pknotz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was a really nice episode.  It really ties together a lot of the topics that you&#039;ve covered in an interesting way.

By the way, Kurzweil has no ownership rights to &quot;singularity&quot;... I think the mathematicians have precedence there (e.g., 1/x has a singularity at x=0).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a really nice episode.  It really ties together a lot of the topics that you&#8217;ve covered in an interesting way.</p>
<p>By the way, Kurzweil has no ownership rights to &#8220;singularity&#8221;&#8230; I think the mathematicians have precedence there (e.g., 1/x has a singularity at x=0).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete F</title>
		<link>http://www.se-radio.net/2008/03/episode-88-the-singularity-research-os-with-galen-hunt/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Singularity seems an odd name for an OS that contrives to prevent things coalescing.

Listening to this episode (and to the one about components) brings to mind objects being held in a kind of suspension.

Fascinating though  -and make me wonder what roadblocks Sun has hit doing something similar. I downloaded JNode the other day just for the fun of seeing it boot up  -but is is obviously a long way from being were Singularity appears to be

The comments about the role of research (feeding ideas to the product inventing people rather than trying to *be* the product inventing people) fitted well with Dave Thomas&#039;s I thought.








]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singularity seems an odd name for an OS that contrives to prevent things coalescing.</p>
<p>Listening to this episode (and to the one about components) brings to mind objects being held in a kind of suspension.</p>
<p>Fascinating though  -and make me wonder what roadblocks Sun has hit doing something similar. I downloaded JNode the other day just for the fun of seeing it boot up  -but is is obviously a long way from being were Singularity appears to be</p>
<p>The comments about the role of research (feeding ideas to the product inventing people rather than trying to *be* the product inventing people) fitted well with Dave Thomas&#8217;s I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rfl4711</title>
		<link>http://www.se-radio.net/2008/03/episode-88-the-singularity-research-os-with-galen-hunt/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>rfl4711</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This interview reminded me a bit of the pypy project - those guys sort of come from the other side, trying to derive static information from dynamic languages.

To my knowledge pypy has not tried to build an OS core, but they have achieved quite an impressive degree of flexibility as far as the compilation process is concerned - the same code can be deployed on a JVM, CLR, natively etc.

check out http://codespeak.net/pypy/

-- Robert Lauer.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This interview reminded me a bit of the pypy project &#8211; those guys sort of come from the other side, trying to derive static information from dynamic languages.</p>
<p>To my knowledge pypy has not tried to build an OS core, but they have achieved quite an impressive degree of flexibility as far as the compilation process is concerned &#8211; the same code can be deployed on a JVM, CLR, natively etc.</p>
<p>check out <a href="http://codespeak.net/pypy/" rel="nofollow">http://codespeak.net/pypy/</a></p>
<p>&#8211; Robert Lauer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
