http://www.se-radio.net/2009/01/episode-123-microsoft-oslo-with-don-box-and-doug-purdy/ The Podcast for Professional Software Developers Tue, 14 May 2013 01:48:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.se-radio.net/2009/01/episode-123-microsoft-oslo-with-don-box-and-doug-purdy/#comment-244 sutambe Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-244 Hi Markus, I was wondering about a comment you made in the podcast about OMG’s QVT. Why are you “not sure of its usefulness”?

]]> http://www.se-radio.net/2009/01/episode-123-microsoft-oslo-with-don-box-and-doug-purdy/#comment-245 The0retico Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-245 Yes, that is true, Markus mentioned it quite a few times before e.g. in Roundtable on MDSD. There was an episode on UML, on OCL, in some episodes he mentions and gives some hints on MDA and the only thing that is left is QVT and maybe some minor topics like SysML and/or HUTN. Will there be episodes on this?

]]> http://www.se-radio.net/2009/01/episode-123-microsoft-oslo-with-don-box-and-doug-purdy/#comment-246 Markus Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-246 Because QVT operations isn’t any better than a number of existing transformation languages, and QVT relational doesn’t have any “mainstream” implementations yet.

]]> http://www.se-radio.net/2009/01/episode-123-microsoft-oslo-with-don-box-and-doug-purdy/#comment-247 Markus Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-247 We’ll certainly do a SysML episode at some point. The textual notation for UML is probably not very useful….

]]> http://www.se-radio.net/2009/01/episode-123-microsoft-oslo-with-don-box-and-doug-purdy/#comment-351 shine Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-351 Very interesting post. Thanks a lot for sharing. keep it up the good work

]]>